Federal prosecutors announced this week that a major New York hospital system will hand over more than a billion dollars to settle claims from patients abused by a former staff urologist over roughly a decade. Here is what the agreement covers and what options exist if you were harmed by a provider at any medical practice, not just this one.
Reviewed by Abuse Justice Center · Updated 2026-07-30
Figures drawn from the federal resolution announced this week and related reporting.
This week, the U.S. Attorney's Office announced it had resolved a years-long federal investigation into how a major New York hospital system handled complaints about a urologist who abused patients, some as young as 13, during exams between 2009 and 2019. Under the agreement, the hospital acknowledged that its policies were not strong enough to catch or stop the abuse while it was happening.
The resolution includes more than $1 billion already paid or promised to patients who came forward, plus a separate $30 million pledge to launch an institute focused on preventing sexual misconduct in healthcare settings nationwide. More than 200 patients have come forward describing abuse by this one provider alone.
Investigators found that a former head of the urology department fielded complaints about the doctor's conduct going back to 2012, roughly seven years before he ultimately left the hospital, but those complaints were never passed up the chain to hospital leadership. That gap allowed the same behavior to continue largely unchecked across the rest of his time there.
This kind of internal failure, where a single supervisor or department sits on complaints instead of reporting them, is a recurring theme in institutional abuse cases far beyond hospitals. It is also exactly the kind of gap a civil claim can examine, even when no one was ever criminally charged for the cover-up itself.
Going forward, the hospital is required to expand chaperone rules for sensitive exams, build a single centralized channel where any staff member can report suspected misconduct, and set clear rules for how those reports get escalated to leadership. It must also self-report any future sexual misconduct allegations involving patients to federal authorities.
These changes matter for anyone currently a patient there, but they do not undo what already happened to prior patients, and they do not limit who else can still come forward about that same provider or about other providers at other facilities entirely.
The details here are specific to one hospital system and one provider, but the pattern is common: a patient is abused during an exam, and the facility either missed the warning signs or failed to act on them. If that happened to you at any clinic, hospital, or private practice, you can look into a civil claim against the provider, the facility, or both.
A free, confidential conversation with an attorney who handles medical abuse cases can help you understand whether your experience fits within your state's filing deadlines and what evidence, from appointment records to prior complaints against the same provider, might support a case. Attorneys who take these cases typically work on contingency, so there is no fee unless they recover money for you.
Cases involving a hospital system and a single provider can feel unique, but the options for survivors of provider abuse are much broader than any one case.
Abuse Justice Center is a lawyer-matching and advocacy service, not a law firm, and nothing here is legal advice. Matching and consultations are free, and network attorneys work on contingency. Need support now? The RAINN hotline is 800-656-4673, 24/7.
No. If you were abused by a medical provider anywhere, that experience can support its own separate civil claim regardless of where it happened.
A civil claim does not require a criminal conviction, or even criminal charges, to move forward.
Filing windows vary by state and can be longer than people expect, especially for abuse that happened during childhood. An attorney can review your specific timeline.
Nothing upfront. Case reviews are free and confidential, and attorneys who take these cases typically work on contingency, meaning they only get paid if you do.