Home / Articles / A Milwaukee Church Was Warned About a Te

A Milwaukee Church Was Warned About a Teacher in 2013. She Says No One Reported It for Years

A new civil complaint says a Catholic grade school principal in Milwaukee learned about a teacher's abuse of a student in 2013 and never told police, the family, or even the next school where he went to work. Here is what the case means if a school or church failed to act on a warning about someone in your life.

Abuse Justice Center · 2026-07-23 · 7 min read

Reviewed by Abuse Justice Center · Updated 2026-07-23

Key takeaways

  • A new lawsuit accuses the Archdiocese of Milwaukee and a parish grade school of sitting on a report about a teacher's abuse of a student starting in 2013, without alerting law enforcement, the school's own administrators, or the child's parents.
  • The teacher named in the complaint later moved to a second Catholic school in the area, where court records show he abused more children before he was eventually criminally charged and convicted.
  • The lawsuit argues the harm did not stop with one classroom: because the first school stayed silent, the same person kept working around kids somewhere else.
  • If a school, church, or youth program knew about a problem and failed to act on it, you may be able to hold that institution responsible even if the original abuse happened years ago and even without a criminal conviction.
COVER-UP ALLEGED
How Institutional Silence Compounds Harm
2 schools
campuses where the teacher named in the complaint is alleged to have had access to students
5+
children the teacher was ultimately convicted of abusing across both schools, per court records
5 years
roughly how long passed between the first alleged report to school leadership and the teacher's eventual arrest

A gap of years between an internal report and any outside action is a recurring pattern attorneys look for when evaluating school and church abuse claims.

What the New Complaint Says Happened

According to the civil complaint, a young girl was sexually abused by her fourth grade teacher during one-on-one tutoring sessions at a Milwaukee parish school beginning in 2013. The lawsuit says the school's principal became aware of the abuse at the time but never reported it to police, never told the girl's parents, and never flagged it to administrators at the school across town where the same teacher went to work a short time later.

The complaint describes a pattern that shows up again and again in institutional abuse cases: an adult in a position of trust is quietly moved along, or simply allowed to keep working, rather than reported. Court records from the teacher's later criminal case show he went on to abuse additional children at that second school before he was finally arrested, tried, and convicted on multiple counts involving several victims across both campuses.

Why the Second School Matters as Much as the First

One detail in the complaint stands out to attorneys who handle these cases: the lawsuit does not just accuse the first school of failing one child. It argues the silence let the same person keep working with kids somewhere new, where he was not yet under any suspicion.

That is the legal theory behind naming both the school and the archdiocese, not just the individual accused of abuse. When an institution has information about a risk to children and does not act on it, and more children are harmed afterward at the same or a different location, survivors from either school may have a claim against the institutions that stayed quiet, not only against the person who abused them.

A Rough Timeline of How This Case Unfolded

Piecing together court records and the new complaint, the gap between the first internal report and any outside action stretched across several years, spanning two schools and multiple victims before the criminal system got involved.

  • 2013: A report reaches school leadership describing the abuse of a student by a classroom teacher during private tutoring.
  • Following years: The teacher moves to a second Catholic school in the area and continues working directly with children.
  • 2018: Criminal charges are filed after additional victims come forward at the second school.
  • 2023 to 2024: The teacher is convicted and sentenced separately in two different counties.
  • 2026: A civil complaint is filed accusing the original school and the archdiocese of failing to report what they knew.

What Counts as a Cover-Up in a Civil Case

You do not need proof that anyone deliberately conspired to hide abuse for a civil claim to exist. Under most state laws, an institution can be held liable for negligence if a supervisor knew or reasonably should have known about misconduct and failed to act, separate from whatever a criminal court eventually decides about the person who committed the abuse.

That distinction matters for families who assume there is nothing to do unless there was a police report or a conviction at the time. A supervisor choosing silence over a phone call to authorities can itself be the basis for a claim against the school, parish, or diocese that employed them.

Questions to Ask Yourself If a School or Church Knew Something and Stayed Quiet

You do not need to have all the answers before requesting a free case review. These are the kinds of facts an attorney will want to understand.

  1. Was there an earlier complaint?: Did a parent, teacher, or another student raise a concern about the same person before you were harmed?
  2. Did the person change locations?: Were they transferred to a different classroom, school, parish, or program instead of being reported?
  3. Who had supervisory authority?: A principal, pastor, athletic director, or program manager with knowledge and the power to act can create institutional liability.
  4. Was law enforcement ever contacted?: Silence toward police, not just toward parents, is often central to these claims.
  5. Is there a paper trail?: Personnel files, prior complaints, or reference letters written when someone left a job can matter years later.
  6. Has anyone else come forward?: Other survivors from the same institution can strengthen a case even if their experiences differ from yours.

Abuse Justice Center is a lawyer-matching and advocacy service, not a law firm, and nothing here is legal advice. Matching and consultations are free, and network attorneys work on contingency. Need support now? The RAINN hotline is 800-656-4673, 24/7.

Related

FAQ

What Survivors Ask Us

Often, yes. Civil claims against an institution focus on what the school, parish, or program knew and failed to do, which is a separate legal question from whether a criminal case was ever filed for your specific incident.

Many states have changed their deadlines for childhood sexual abuse claims, including temporary windows that let people file cases that would otherwise be too old. A free case review can tell you what applies where you live.

No. You do not need to have been part of any existing case, or even attend the same school named in the news, to have your own situation evaluated.

No. Case evaluations are free and confidential, and attorneys in matters like this typically work on contingency, meaning there is no fee unless they recover money for you.